Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:
> I would argue the sequence doesn't really matter that much for non SWIG > packages I don't think that this is correct. Or at least, it's not obvious to me that this is correct. It's not uncommon for projects to extend distutils in various ways and the proposed change may break those packages. Adding a separate build step for SWIG (then the order would be build_swig, build_py, build_ext) would be safer and IMHO also more logical. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37247> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
