Inada Naoki <[email protected]> added the comment:
> Most of changes are in not performance sensitive code. I do not think there
> is a benefit of using new macro there.
Because I used just sed.
> If PyUnicode_FromString() is slow I prefer to optimize it instead of adding
> yet one esoteric private function for internal needs.
OK. There are some code like `PyUnicode_FromString(name)`. Optimizing
PyUnicode_FromString will be more effective. I created PR 14273.
> In case of dict.__repr__() we can get even more gain by using _Py_IDENTIFIER
> or more general API proposed by Victor.
Of course, I used it just for micro benchmarking. Optimizing it is not a goal.
In case of PR 14273:
$ ./python -m pyperf timeit -s 'd={}' -- 'repr(d)'
.....................
Mean +- std dev: 138 ns +- 2 ns
----------
title: add _PyUnicode_FROM_ASCII macro -> Optimize PyUnicode_GetString for
short ASCII strings
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37348>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
