STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
I marked bpo-37389 as a duplicate of this issue:
"""
msg346410 - (view) Author: Daniel W Forsyth (d...@dataforge.on.ca)
Date: 2019-06-24 14:53
After putting a basic ThreadingUDPServer under load (500 messages per/second)
I noticed that after a night it was consuming a lot of RAM given it does
nothing with the data.
On inception, I noticed the _thread count inside the server was growing forever
even though the sub-threads are done.
Setup a basic ThreadingUDPSever with handler that does nothing and check the
request_queue_size, it seems to grow without limit.
msg346411 - (view) Author: Daniel W Forsyth (d...@dataforge.on.ca)
Date: 2019-06-24 14:59
The only way I could figure out to control it was to do this in a thread;
for thread in server._threads: # type: Thread
if not thread.is_alive():
server._threads.remove(thread)
Shouldn't the server process do this when the thread is done?
"""
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37193>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
