STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
> To me, it doesn't seem dangerous to backport that, but I would love to hear > what Eryk and others think :) In my experience, any change is dangerous :-) The initial bug doesn't contain any reproducer. I'm talking about: > If one of the processes in that list is gone, then (...) "The handle is > invalid" (...) will prevent you from creating any new processes with Popen > after that It's the first time that I see such bug report. It seems like subprocess works for most people :-) Can you elobrate how to reproduce this issue to justify a backport? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37380> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
