Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > Are we talking about the same commit ? 59654 as in your original about > it breaking existing code.
Oops, no. I now see that r59654 is fine for backporting. My last message was about r59653, which probably does introduce backward compatibility problems. The other changes seem to introduce new features, so they are out of scope. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4342> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
