Flavian Hautbois <f.hautb...@gmail.com> added the comment:
So what do we do about this? Two possibilities: 1. We merge PR 9765 and close PRs 345 and 201, as 9765 seems more straighforward and was already approved. 9765 should be resubmitted to be merged since the base repo does not exist anymore, I could do that. 2. We consider that this is out of scope for Python, and since jq is widely used, it does not make a lot of sense to include it. We should then close all PRs to keep our pull requests clean I suggest going with 2 ---------- nosy: +flavianhautbois _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue29636> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
