Greg Price <gnpr...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Speaking of improving functionality: > Having unicodedata readily accessible to the str type would also permit > higher a fidelity unicode implementation. For example, implementing > language-tailored str.lower() requires having canonical combining class of a > character available. This data lives only in unicodedata currently. Benjamin, can you say more about the behavior you have in mind here? I don't entirely follow. (Is or should there be an issue for it?) ---------- versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32771> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
