Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Looks good. Marking as accepted. Before applying, consider adding back the part of the docs with the '1 + floor(...' definition. I think it provides a useful alternative way to look at what the method does. Also, it gives a useful mathematical expression that can be used in reasoning about invariants. More importantly, we should provide it because it is so easy to make a mistake when rolling your own version of the formula (i.e. using ceil instead of floor or having an off by one error). ---------- resolution: -> accepted _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3439> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
