Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Since I don't see a benefit from this change I leave both patches > to you Raymond. After more reflection, I also don't see any point of doing this. While there is a minor whiff of consistency when using Py_SIZE(), it makes the assignment look weird and inconsistent between filled and used. I now favor local consistency and clarity (with in setobject.c) over trying to make it look exactly like some other modules. ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue28988> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
