Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I noticed a very similar story in CHECK_BINOP. How about we don't do any more of these :-) I understand the desire to have an explicit return but don't think these minor aesthetics are worth it. The existing code was correct. The patches increase the total code volume. There are subtle differences during the transformation (macros don't require type declarations). They are a bit tedious to review and are eating up our time in the back and forth. All changes like this risk introducing bugs into otherwise correct code. Minor code churn is rarely worth it. May I suggest directing your efforts towards fixing known bugs or implementing requested features. It isn't our goal to create more work for one another ;-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37812> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
