Paul Ganssle <p.gans...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I have compiled both versions with optimizations on, looks like the gap gets a
bit smaller (percentage-wise) after that:
benchmark | master (ns) | PR 15633 (ns) | Δ (%)
------------------------------------+---------------+-----------------+----------
call only (datetime) | 73 (±3) | 92.3 (±7) | 26
constructor + call (datetime) | 228 (±9) | 260 (±16) | 14
timedelta + call (datetime) | 108 (±5) | 128 (±9) | 18
If this were something fundamental like a performance regression in building a
tuple or constructing a dictionary or something I'd be concerned, but this just
reinforces my feeling that, on balance, this is worth it, and that we are
probably not going to need a "fast path" version of this.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24416>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
