Paul Ganssle <p.gans...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hi Yixing, thank you for your bug report. This issue has already been reported, and the discussion is in issue #22377. In the short term I believe the solution will be to document the current behavior. In the long term there are some solutions, though I imagine none of them will be amazingly satisfying, because the output of %Z is basically freeform and doesn't necessarily match to an unambiguous offset. The best you'd be able to do would be %Z%z or %z%Z, but there will be many implementation challenges there. ---------- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> %Z in strptime doesn't match EST and others _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38139> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
