Ma Lin <malin...@163.com> added the comment:
Recent commits for longobject.c
Revision: 5e63ab05f114987478a21612d918a1c0276fe9d2
Author: Greg Price <gnpr...@gmail.com>
Date: 19-8-25 1:19:37
Message:
bpo-37812: Convert CHECK_SMALL_INT macro to a function so the return is
explicit. (GH-15216)
The concern for this issue is: implicit return from macro.
We can add a comment before the call sites of CHECK_SMALL_INT macro, to explain
that there is a possible return.
Revision: 6b519985d23bd0f0bd072b5d5d5f2c60a81a19f2
Author: animalize <animal...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: 19-9-6 14:00:56
Message:
replace inline function `is_small_int` with a macro version (GH-15710)
Then this commit is not necessary.
Revision: c6734ee7c55add5fdc2c821729ed5f67e237a096
Author: Sergey Fedoseev <fedoseev.ser...@gmail.com>
Date: 19-9-12 22:41:14
Message:
bpo-37802: Slightly improve perfomance of PyLong_FromUnsigned*() (GH-15192)
This commit introduced a compiler warning due to this line [1]:
d:\dev\cpython\objects\longobject.c(412): warning C4244: “function”: from
“unsigned long” to “sdigit ”，may lose data
[1] the line:
return get_small_int((ival)); \
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Objects/longobject.c#L386
Revision: 42acb7b8d29d078bc97b0cfd7c4911b2266b26b9
Author: HongWeipeng <961365...@qq.com>
Date: 19-9-18 23:10:15
Message:
bpo-35696: Simplify long_compare() (GH-16146)
IMO this commit reduces readability a bit.
We can sort out these problems.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37812>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
