Jason R. Coombs <jar...@jaraco.com> added the comment:
> I'm not against that concept, but it is only appropriate for >= 3.9 as that'd > be adding a feature. This issue is marked a release blocker to decide what > to do for 3.5-3.7 (and maybe 3.8 if deemed a serious breaking change). The key part of the regression for 2.7 and 3.5+ was that it became impractical to retain the existing behavior of sending invalid bytes. My recommendation is to provide a mechanism to achieve compatibility with the older versions of Python. Although it's a "feature", it's also a feature necessitated by the security bugfix and to alleviate the regression. For this reason, I think the change should be applied to all Python versions that were patched for the security issue. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38216> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com