New submission from Emil Bode <bodee...@gmail.com>:
Initializing/creating a new set with an empty string via the set-command
returns an empty set instead of set with the empty string.
As in:
While set('somestring') gives me a set of size one,
set('') gives me an empty set (of size zero), just as set() would do
It is possible to create a set with an empty string, as the command {''} and
set(['']) work just as expected
----------
messages: 353585
nosy: EmilBode
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Creating set with empty string returns empty set
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.7
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38327>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
