Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > A blunt, ineffective solution would be to walk the tree before removing > it and recording path : inode pairs in a dict on first pass and then > checking that the inodes have not changed during removal on second pass.
There's no way to do the "check inode then remove" sequence atomically. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4489> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
