Dong-hee Na <donghee.n...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I think that everybody would like to see more working implementations of > Python: I definitely agree with it :) > I'm not sure of which kind of changes do you have in mind. > Such contribution is very welcomed :-) I know some of the projects which implementing Python3.x interpreter with non-C languages. (e.g GraalPython, RustPython) I just want to know there will be a chance to them if they meet the wall to implementing an interpreter due to their language-specific issue. And it will be good news to them. :) Thanks for the kind explanation about this sensitive issue. Is it okay to change the resolution of this issue to won't fix? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38513> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
