Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Can we go back to the original issue? Should we just > document the "early out" behaviour on hitting zero, > or should we follow the suggestion to check for bad > data and raise? I would follow Tim's recommendation to document it and be done with it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38382> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
