Lukas Vacek <lucas.va...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Christian, I don't want to argue.
Feel free to close both this bug and the PR as "enhancement rejected". Adding
one ./configure option is not really worth arguing over, I can always compile
python as I need. I just tried to solve the same problem for others because
other people also want a simple way to install a new version of Python on old
distros and have a working ssl module.
If my contribution is not welcome it's fine.
However, I have a feeling the reason for the rejection is not technical because
after I stated I am happy to help solve the problem in other ways ("If you can
think of a better real world solution than static linking OpenSSL please share
and let's do it!") you literally twisted my words 180 degrees ("You are trying
to solve a problem by dictating the solution at the same time."). This is very
inappropriate.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38794>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
