Jukka Väisänen <vai...@vaizki.fi> added the comment: > Are you aware of what currently supported platforms have SO_REUSEPORT defined > where the *reuse_port* parameter doesn't actually work? This would be quite > helpful to know.
This was reported by a partner that was working porting our code to Android but might be fixed current Android API levels. I cannot test this myself. > .. we don't directly support every single available platform, as making the > code specific to an OS incurs a long-term maintenance cost Fully agree, part of the reason why I was suggesting getting rid of reuse_address and reuse_port completely on this higher level API. But I'm happy with Antoine's proposal which effectively kills the reuse_address parameter, just suggesting we also kill reuse_port as well. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37228> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
