Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I was able to consistently reproduce the above failure using 200 parallel > workers, even without `-f`. Oops, I didn't mean without passing `-F`, as this would result in only a single test being ran. I meant without letting it repeat multiple times, as in the test failure would consistently occur in the first batch of 200 parallel workers. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37224> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
