Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
-1 I don't think this would be an improvement. We already have a builtin callable() function documented, and we have the documented Callable() abstract base class, and the __call__ method is documented in the library reference. I don't we need yet another entry describing a straight-forward concept. Also I don't think we should litter the rest of docs with a link to a term-callable everytime we use the wordl. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38900> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
