New submission from Matt McEwen <[email protected]>:
The Generator ABC in the standard library lets users define objects that follow
the Generator specification given in PEP342, and which can be used in the place
of builtin generator objects.
This was originally added in issue 24018
The ABC enforces that the methods `send`, `throw` and `close` are implemented,
as per the spec. It doesn't enforce that `__del__` is implemented. PEP342
specifies that `__del__` be a wrapper for `close`, such that when a generator
object is garbage collected `close` is called.
For a user (like me) implementing such a generator object by inheriting the
Generator ABC, the resulting objects do not have `close` called when they are
garbage collected. Fixing this requires manually implementing a `__del__` that
calls `close`.
Ideally from the user perspective, inheriting from Generator should be enough
to guarantee that the object behaves like a generator object, provided the
abstract methods are correctly implemented. This could be easily achieved by
implementing `__del__` concretely in the ABC as a wrapper for `close`:
def __del__(self):
self.close()
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 357467
nosy: Matt McEwen
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: include __del__ in Generator ABC
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38911>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
