Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> It seems to me that the performance gains here really outweigh any weird > usage of LD_PRELOAD. I am very convinced of this assertion, but other users could not be, I think the discussion is how to provide/activate the option in the less intrusive way and without breaking too many use cases. To be honest, I think it would be very rare for users to use LD_PRELOAD in this way, so I am fine if we activate it by default. But I still think it would be good to discuss these cases and take them into consideration :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38980> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
