Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment: Based on my reading of the pydev discussion, the doc correctly describes the design intent. If there is any bug, it is in the optimization of skipping the apparently redundant first name binding. I presume the thinking was that since the decorator gets the function as an input, there is no sensible need to access it again via its name. A conforming implementation should be free to not do this optimization, but to simply make the easy and obvious translation.
---------- nosy: +tjreedy _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4793> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
