Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Maybe port this discussion over python-ideas and after the resolution open it > again? Sounds good to me. Adding a new builtin function is a big deal that would likely need a PEP. I'm not keen on adding something like this to the math module, either, when it's so simple to construct from max and min. Closing as rejected here; it can be re-opened if there's a strong consensus for adding it on the ideas list. ---------- nosy: +mark.dickinson resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36788> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
