STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
> The other approach is to leave the current static singletons alone and > only use them for the main interpreter. Each subinterpreter would get > its own copy, created when that interpreter is initialized. Which API should be used in C extensions to be "subinterpreter-safe"? Currently, Py_None is a singleton shared by multiple interpreters. Should suddenly all C extensions use a new Py_GetNone() function which returns the per-interpreter singleton? If yes, that's basically what my PR 18301 does: #define Py_None Py_GetNone() ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39511> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
