Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks, Richard for your proposal. I concur with Batuhan: I am -1 as well on this addition. Echoing some of the same ideas, I think this is specialized enough that does not make sense to have it in the standard library, especially if a Pypi package already exists. Additionally, this is straightforward to implement for very simple cases but PR18558 will fail for very generic ASTs if they are deep enough (it uses recursion). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39686> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
