Elad Lahav <e2la...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I'm not convinced that a multi-threaded fork()+exec() from C would be any better, unless the Python code goes to great lengths to avoid any non-async-signal-safe operations between the fork() and the exec(). So along with the proposed change to switch to the subprocess() module I would like to propose that that module switch to using posix_spawn() instead of fork()+exec(). ---------- type: behavior -> versions: -Python 3.9 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39763> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
