New submission from brian.gallagher <oss.brn...@gmail.com>:
1 import argparse
2
3 parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test')
4 parser.add_argument('c', help='token c')
5 parser.add_argument('b', help='token b')
6 parser.add_argument('d', help='token d')
7 parser.add_argument('-a', help='token a')
8 parser.add_argument('-z', help='token z')
9 parser.add_argument('-f', help='token f', required=True)
10 parser.print_help()
It would be nice if we could have the option to alphabetically sort the tokens
in the optional and positional arguments sections of the help message in order
to find an argument more quickly when reading long help descriptions.
Currently we output the following, when the above program is ran:
positional arguments:
c token c
b token b
d token d
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-a A token a
-z Z token z
-f F token f
I'm proposing that we provide a mechanism to allow alphabetical ordering of
both sections, like so:
positional arguments:
b token b
c token c
d token d
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-a A token a
-f F token f
-z Z token z
I've chosen to leave -h as an exception, as it will always be there as an
optional argument, but it could easily be treated no different.
We could provide an optional argument to print_help(sort=False) as a potential
approach.
If this is something that the maintainer's would be willing to accept, I'd love
to take it on and prepare a patch.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 362849
nosy: brian.gallagher
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: [argparse] Add parameter to sort help output arguments
type: enhancement
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39779>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
