New submission from Joey <[email protected]>:
If you pass in an instance of an object without type annotations, you get an
error that states "XXX is not a module, class, method, or function." This
correctly describes the situation
typing.get_type_hints(object())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/typing.py", line 1252, in get_type_hints
raise TypeError('{!r} is not a module, class, method, '
TypeError: <object object at 0x7f577b44ffb0> is not a module, class, method, or
function.
However, if you pass in an instance of a class that _does_ have type
annotations...
>class Bar:
... foo: int
>typing.get_type_hints(Bar())
{'foo': <class 'int'>}
You don't get an error even though the message of the first exception would
suggest you do.
Fix should be pretty easy, either just have the get_type_hints always return a
dictionary, and return an empty dictionary if the type of the object has no
__annotations__ defined (my preferred solution), or actually check to see if
the object is an instance of `_allowed_types` before checking whether the
object has annotations.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 363450
nosy: j.tran4418
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: get_type_hints raises inconsistent TypeError
versions: Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39866>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
