Tim Peters <t...@python.org> added the comment:
Sorry, I don't see "a problem" here either. Rounding instead can change the precise nature of the correlations if you insist on starting from the same seed, but it hardly seems a real improvement; e.g., >>> random.seed(12) >>> [round(random.random() * 100) for i in range(10)] [47, 66, 67, 14, 1, 37, 27, 81, 69, 60] >>> random.seed(12) >>> [round(random.random() * 101) for i in range(10)] [48, 66, 67, 14, 1, 38, 28, 82, 70, 61] That is, while there are fewer identical values, the correlation is nevertheless obvious and extreme. Not only not a bug, it's not even surprising ;-) ---------- nosy: +tim.peters _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39867> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
