STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
trip_signal() has another problem. If pending->finishing is non-zero, _PyEval_AddPendingCall() uses the C API whereas the current thread may not hold the GIL. That's forbidden by the C API. The more I think about it, the more I think that pending->finishing is fragile and should be removed. I understood that pending->finishing was added to workaround crashes during Python finalization. I fixed multiple crashes related to daemon threads during Python finalization in bpo-39877. Maybe the bugs that I fixed were the ones which pending->finishing was supposed to work around. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37127> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com