hai shi <shihai1...@126.com> added the comment:
> The historical background is code coverage of C code seemed like a good idea, > so we set it up. :) Not much else to it. Hm, code coverage of C code including two parts: 1) coverage of inner c code; 2) extension modules built by distutils; If I understand correct, we force on 1) is good enough, no? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40237> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
