Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
[Victor] > Honestly, if you consider that BaseRandom base class is not worth it, I will > just abandon this idea. It's not that I think it's not worth it (I'm not currently convinced either way). It's more that if we're going to make a change, then it's not clear to me that the particular choice in the BaseRandom PR is necessarily the only or best way to do it. There are a good few technical choices to be made, and I think there's value in having a wider discussion. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40346> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
