STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
> With my msg367463 patch (add sleep), test_cancel_futures() fails. The test uses sleep() as a synchronization primitive: executor.submit(time.sleep, .1). That's bad, but it doesn't *have to* be fixed now. My msg367463 patch adds an artifical sleep: the test looks fine in practice. I prefer to wait until it fails on a buildbot worker before spending time to make the test more reliable. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39995> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
