Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
FWIW, this doesn't preclude the other proposal if it ever gains traction and moves forward. This just takes existing functionality and improves clarity and discoverability. The core issue is that if you only want a simple unbounded cache, it isn't obvious that that behavior is buried in the lru_cache() API. In hindsight, this always should have been separate functionality. And some day we may deprecate the maxsize=None option which is somewhat opaque. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40571> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
