Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
I would probably prefer the table without the '()'s. (I would have to see to be sure.) However, the entries in the source .rst are all tagged with ':func:', as in ":func:`abs`", and that tag both adds "()" and makes the entries click-linked to the entries (which are tagged "function:: abs(x)", etc). This is the standard used in the doc and whatever I might prefer, I will not propose adding a variant tag just for the table. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40646> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com