Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> The other way to solve my problem would be to provide an operator module > function (operator.as_float?) that does a duck-typed conversion of an > arbitrary Python object to a float. This does feel like the *right* solution to me. See #40801 and the linked PR. If we can do something like this, I'd be happy to drop the expectation that __float__ return something of exact type float, and similarly for __index__. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue17576> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
