Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
That was a *big* patch to importlib.resources... And newly defined and standardised protocols? That seems like a lot to bring in without having gone through a PEP anyway, despite the minor bug that has drawn attention to it. I don't think backports should be treated as incubators for standard modules, getting new features that then flow directly into the stdlib. It's fine to have a fork for incubation, but people need to rely on consistency in stdlib and backports. All that to say, I think we should revert the importlib changes *anyway*, and also because there's something wrong with them right now. ---------- nosy: +steve.dower _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40924> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com