Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:

> Last question before PR pls: given the fact that this test is to cover a 
> fixed case when loop.sock_*() was hanging forever, should I keep the 
> wait_for(..., timeout=10)?

For now, I think we can keep the asyncio.wait_for() w/ 10 the sec timeout. I'll 
have to run the tests locally though w/ the patch to double check (once the PR 
is opened), and it may still end up needing to be increased if the test fails 
again in the future. It should be okay though.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30064>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to