Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: combinations_with_replacement addition looks good. Thank you.
I wonder whether the second argument should be constrained to be an integer? I find the following a little surprising: >>> list(combinations_with_replacement(range(5), -0.3)) [()] (same behaviour with combinations and permutations). Should I open a separate issue for this, or is it just not worth changing? _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5048> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
