Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> added the comment:
Christian: Help! Again! I merged your PR, pulled a fresh copy, built it, and ran the test suite. I get seven failures in I think the same modules. Most of the failures are either "ssl.SSLError: [SSL] internal error (_ssl.c:728)", or some flavor of "OSError: [Errno 0] Error". Sadly not helpful. But! Occasionally the test suite prints a very telling error: ssl.SSLError: [SSL: DH_KEY_TOO_SMALL] dh key too small (_ssl.c:3233) Attached is the output of running just those seven tests. (One test is now working, not sure why.) Obviously these tests pass on the buildbots, I assume that's because their OpenSSL is slightly older. But I don't think I can ship 3.5.10rc1 if it won't build with current OpenSSL. You should be able to simply pull the current 3.5 head (d565be84993a3d618add139cf21038e12c60a13e) to reproduce the error. ---------- title: Workaround or fix for SSL "EE_KEY_TOO_SMALL" test failures -> Workaround or fix for SSL ".._KEY_TOO_SMALL" test failures Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file49286/failures _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41183> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
