Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment: If #19521 had been merged I would be all for closing this as a duplicate. However, if i have read all the comments correctly noone has tested the other pr.
As the approaches are quite different I think both should be open until a decision is made on the better approach. Closing one (asap) is a good idea, especially if that leads to something being merged so this is finally repaired. Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Aug 2020, at 23:07, Stefan Krah <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > > Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> added the comment: > > I understand that both of you are in favor of #19521 (the patch of > which I have not tried yet). > > Can we close this as a duplicate? Please just reopen if you disagree. > > ---------- > nosy: +skrah > resolution: -> duplicate > stage: patch review -> resolved > status: open -> closed > superseder: -> Parallel build race condition on AIX since python-2.7 > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue40424> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40424> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
