Damien Neil <ne...@misago.org> added the comment: On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > This is DOM parsing, not SAX parsing.
1) The title of this ticket begins with "xml.sax and xml.dom...". 2) I am creating a SAX parser and passing it to xml.dom, which uses it. > So break layers of abstraction, then. Or else, use dom.expatbuilder, > and ignore SAX/pulldom for DOM parsing. Is that really the answer? Read the source code to xml.dom.*, and write hacks based on what I find there? Note also that xml.dom.expatbuilder does not appear to be an external API--there is no mention of it in the documentation for xml.dom.*. > This tracker is really not the place to ask questions; use python-list > for that. That was a rhetorical question. The answer is, as best I can tell, "You can't do that." _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2124> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com