Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Agreed. It makes great sense that textwrap started as highly ASCII-centric. > But in the Python 3, Unicode-friendly era, ASCII-biased isn't where we should > leave things. It needs Unicode experts. If we support Unicode, we should implemente UAX #14. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/tr14-45.html But I am not sure some core developer love textwrap and Unicode enough to implement it. It can be implemented in 3rd party package before adding it in stdlib. Then, is U+2014 really important to implement even though we can not implement UAX#14 in foreseeable future? It doesn't make sense to me. ---------- nosy: +methane _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue30680> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
