Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
To clarify what I mean with: > - We could also do the same for operations like "some_container[]" if the > container is some builtin. We can substitute/specialize the opcode for > someone that directly uses built-in operations instead of the generic > BINARY_SUBSCR. If a given function has a BINARY_SUBSCR opcode and when executing it a given number of times we see that the object to get the subscript is always a list, we change the BINARY_SUBSCR to BINARY_SUBSCR_FOR_LISTS and it that opcode we do a quick check for PyList_CheckExact and if is correct we call "Objects/listobject.c:list_subscript" directly and if is false we put back a BINARY_SUBSCR. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42115> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
