Diogo Dutra <diogodutradam...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Are you suggesting this is a bug, or is it just a suggested code cleanup?
It is a suggested code cleanup. My point is that the code creates two sets based on the Sequence `fs`. I think it is better if the code creates the set just one time, instead of two times. Em dom., 25 de out. de 2020 às 18:57, Chris Jerdonek <rep...@bugs.python.org> escreveu: > > Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Are you suggesting this is a bug, or is it just a suggested code cleanup? > I ask because the docs suggest that a set should be passed: > https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.wait > > And the docstring says it should be a sequence: > > https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/d1a0a960ee493262fb95a0f5b795b5b6d75cecb8/Lib/asyncio/tasks.py#L373-L376 > > So while code cleanup is okay, I'm not sure support for general iterator > arguments can / should be guaranteed. > > ---------- > nosy: +chris.jerdonek > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue42140> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42140> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
