Batuhan Taskaya <isidenti...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Sorry, but making builtins.callable generic looks wrong to me. It is a > predicate, not a constructor. If it would be called "iscallable" instead of > "callable" nobody would propose to make it generic, right? It's just a > coincidence that the name of this predicate equals to the name of > typing.Callable and collections.abc.Callable. I concur with Serhiy on this. ---------- nosy: +BTaskaya _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42102> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
