New submission from Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com>:
Some comments in C code still refer to bytearray object as bytes object and to bytes object as string object. The proposed PR fixes outdated comments. It also moves the definition of macros F_LJUST etc from public header to private header. They are only used internally and never leaked to the user. They were defined in two places: in Include/bytesobject.h and Objects/bytesobject.c. Is it true that headers in Include/internal are more private than headers in Include/cpython? It is not clear from names. ---------- components: Interpreter Core messages: 381604 nosy: serhiy.storchaka, vstinner priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fix outdated bytes comments versions: Python 3.10 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42431> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
